Great Pulley Problem
Moderator: Jim Walsh
- bottomscraper
- Posts: 1400
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 11:08
- Location: Previous Owner of CD36 Mahalo #163 1990
- Contact:
The Physics Classroom - Online
For those interested in this problem and others like it might I suggest taking a look at this:
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/v ... ectoc.html
The math is just vector math which you probably already know for solving navigation problems.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/v ... ectoc.html
The math is just vector math which you probably already know for solving navigation problems.
Rich Abato
Nordic Tug 34 Tanuki
Previous Owner Of CD36 Mahalo #163
Southern Maine
http://www.sailmahalo.com
Nordic Tug 34 Tanuki
Previous Owner Of CD36 Mahalo #163
Southern Maine
http://www.sailmahalo.com
- Chris Reinke
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Apr 14th, '05, 14:59
- Location: CD330 - Innisfail (Gaelic for "A Little Bit Of Heaven on Earth"), Onset, MA
Carl - I believe you have captured the true understanding of the question, and possed the best explanation as to an answer. I would like to offer a simple summary I was offered many years ago in sailing school :
A stationary block represents a change in direction, while a moving block represents mechanical advantage. I am sure someone will find fault in this simple explanation......but it works for me.
Now to add fuel to the fire - How is the weight secured to the line? Most knots used in sailing have an inner bend that is less than 2x the diameter of the line. In doing so, the outer edge of the bent line is weighted with the majority of the load, while the inner edge of the line is slack. This is the fundamental reason for recommended block diameters being more then twice the diameter of the line running over them. In the case of a bowline the breaking strength of the knot is as low as 60% of the line tensile strength. Is the line secured with a thimble, or does John need to stay awake nights trying to include a reduced breaking strength component in his theory?
A stationary block represents a change in direction, while a moving block represents mechanical advantage. I am sure someone will find fault in this simple explanation......but it works for me.
Now to add fuel to the fire - How is the weight secured to the line? Most knots used in sailing have an inner bend that is less than 2x the diameter of the line. In doing so, the outer edge of the bent line is weighted with the majority of the load, while the inner edge of the line is slack. This is the fundamental reason for recommended block diameters being more then twice the diameter of the line running over them. In the case of a bowline the breaking strength of the knot is as low as 60% of the line tensile strength. Is the line secured with a thimble, or does John need to stay awake nights trying to include a reduced breaking strength component in his theory?
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
- Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
- Contact:
No knots required
True, knots will reduce the breaking strength of the line. By the way, in John's example, the line would have failed because he/we didn't factor in the weight of the line itself. I suggest eliminating the weights and the knots and instead just start with 20 lbs of rope, i.e., 10 lbs on each side of the pulley.Chris Reinke wrote:Now to add fuel to the fire - How is the weight secured to the line?
Fair winds, Neil
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
- John Vigor
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Aug 27th, '06, 15:58
- Contact:
It won't break
Thank you, Carl. You have clearly described what I have always regarded as magic--the fact that a line able to bear a tension of only 10 pounds will support 20 pounds without breaking because of the way it sheds the load to the sheave or peg. The tension in the line is no more than 10 pounds at any one point. As you say, the line will not break. This is obviously a very difficult concept for some people to absorb.
Perhaps we need to think about anchor chain now. The principle seems to be exactly the same. An upright link of chain has two rods bearing the tension vertically, but it has only one rod going horizontally across the top--yet that one rod can bear the same force as the two rods combined. Once again, it's magic as far as I'm concerned.
Cheers,
John V.
Perhaps we need to think about anchor chain now. The principle seems to be exactly the same. An upright link of chain has two rods bearing the tension vertically, but it has only one rod going horizontally across the top--yet that one rod can bear the same force as the two rods combined. Once again, it's magic as far as I'm concerned.
Cheers,
John V.
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
- Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
- Contact:
Re: It won't break
The difference being that the advertised breaking strength for chain already takes that into consideration.John Vigor wrote:Perhaps we need to think about anchor chain now. The principle seems to be exactly the same. An upright link of chain has two rods bearing the tension vertically, but it has only one rod going horizontally across the top--yet that one rod can bear the same force as the two rods combined.
On the other hand, if you set two anchors from a single chain looped over a windlass, can you then cut the chain size (i.e., breaking strength) in half?
Fair winds, Neil
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
-
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Nov 21st, '05, 08:20
- Location: CD28 Cruiser "Loon" Poorhouse Cove, ME
Sorry, different failure mechanism here.
I haven't taken the time to fully consider this, but my first inclination is that our analogy breaks down here. Rope is flexible and chain is made of solid links. The links themselves cannot deform. The two rods are in tension, but where the two links bear on each other, there's a significant shear component. There are different stresses at work here than in rope. And, as Neil said, the rating on the chain takes this into account. My GUESS is, the strength in tension is greater than the shear strength, so shear would govern. Strictly a guess, but an educated guess.
CDSOA Commodore - Member No. 725
"The more I expand the island of my knowledge, the more I expand the shoreline of my wonder"
Sir Isaac Newton
"The more I expand the island of my knowledge, the more I expand the shoreline of my wonder"
Sir Isaac Newton
Good explanation, Carl
Yup, Carl, you and Didereaux cleared it up for me. I guess when you're retired for a while you shouldn't shoot from the hip w/o making sure your belt is tight.
Thanks.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
- Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
- Contact:
Re: It won't break
Wait... I think it's what Didereaux said. The peg/sheave doesn't absorb anything; all it does is facilitate the change in direction of the force.John Vigor wrote:... magic--the fact that a line able to bear a tension of only 10 pounds will support 20 pounds without breaking because of the way it sheds the load to the sheave or peg. The tension in the line is no more than 10 pounds at any one point.
Okay, try this one, as a way to eliminate the effect of the pulley and the change in direction. Let's make the exercise horizontal. I exert 10 lbs of force on the line and you exert 10 lbs in the other direction. What's the force on the line?
10 lbs <---------------10 or 20?----------------> 10 lbs
Fair winds, Neil
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
- s-dupuis
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mar 20th, '06, 11:56
- Location: CD 22, Setting Star, Manchester NH
- Contact:
20 Lbs. is my guess
As long as the line is free, that is, not fixed to anything.
Picture a scale attached to each end of the line, the type you might use to weigh a fish. The spring inside the scale needs 10 pounds of force for it to accurately read 10 lbs. If both scales indicate 10 lbs. then there must be a total of 20 lbs. being exerted on the rope.
I'm also guessing that the 20 lbs. of force is spread out along the entire length of the rope.
Wouldn't this beg the question that the breaking strength of a line would need to be based on a specific length of line?
Steve
Picture a scale attached to each end of the line, the type you might use to weigh a fish. The spring inside the scale needs 10 pounds of force for it to accurately read 10 lbs. If both scales indicate 10 lbs. then there must be a total of 20 lbs. being exerted on the rope.
I'm also guessing that the 20 lbs. of force is spread out along the entire length of the rope.
Wouldn't this beg the question that the breaking strength of a line would need to be based on a specific length of line?
Steve
In Neil's example
Suppose, as in Neil's example, you attach a spring scale (like you weigh fish with) to a hook on a wall. You pull on the other end of the spring with a force of 10 pounds. The spring scale is reading 10 pounds and the wall is applying a force of 10 pounds against you (through the material in the wall).
If you remove the spring scale from the wall and have someone pull against your 10 pound force with a 10 pound force, the scale would still read 10 pounds.
If you remove the spring scale from the wall and have someone pull against your 10 pound force with a 10 pound force, the scale would still read 10 pounds.
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
- Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
- Contact:
Re: 20 Lbs. is my guess
Do it vertically and the scales will both read 10 lbs if you hang a 10 lb weight. The lower scale weighs the 10 lb weight. The upper scale weights everything under it which, if you ignore the lower scale and the rope, is the same 10 lb weight.s-dupuis wrote: The spring inside the scale needs 10 pounds of force for it to accurately read 10 lbs. If both scales indicate 10 lbs. then there must be a total of 20 lbs. being exerted on the rope.
I'm also guessing that the 20 lbs. of force is spread out along the entire length of the rope.
Wouldn't this beg the question that the breaking strength of a line would need to be based on a specific length of line?
Tension in the line is the same along the whole line and so doesn't depend on length. If you exceed the breaking strength, the line will fail, probably at the manufacturing weak point (and excluding weaker connectors and/or knots) if all else is equal, since 100% consistency along the line seems impossible.
Fair winds, Neil
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
- Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
- Contact:
Re: In Neil's example
So if you pass the line over a pulley and change its direction but apply the same force, do you still get 10 lbs no matter where you put the scales?Ed Haley wrote:Suppose, as in Neil's example, you attach a spring scale (like you weigh fish with) to a hook on a wall. You pull on the other end of the spring with a force of 10 pounds. The spring scale is reading 10 pounds and the wall is applying a force of 10 pounds against you (through the material in the wall).
If you remove the spring scale from the wall and have someone pull against your 10 pound force with a 10 pound force, the scale would still read 10 pounds.
Fair winds, Neil
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698
s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA
CDSOA member #698