I'm not suggesting it's "wrong" nor will I try to quote chapter and verse, but here are a few ideas off the top of what's left of my head.Megunticook wrote:What's the rationale there? Hamilton's guidance is pendant needs to be "a minimum of 3 times the height of your bow off the water." There's no harm in "too long" unless you don't have the swing room. But correct me if I'm wrong (just explain the reasoning). ...kerrydeare wrote:First, this mooring is for your own Typhoon, and there's little reason to employ a 16 foot pendant. Way too long.
A typical rarely used mooring usually gets fouled by marine growth and other detritus while not in use. This makes handling a problem, since clearing off growth, barnacles, and similar when picking up the gear means the "stuff" ends up on the boat, on your clothes, or even below. Shorter gear avoids this to some extent, simplifying your work routine. It also means that barnacles left on the longer line will not somehow scratch the topsides if and when the boat encounters wind-against-tide situations. Second, longer lines mean a higher possibility of fouling other vessels who wander in in the dark, etc. It's just lubberly. Third, it's at least theoretically possible to secure the gear either on the top of the mooring, on a purpose-designed pickup, or the like, when not in use if the gear is sufficiently short. Fourth, oversize vessels who otherwise ignore your "22 max" warning will get the idea when they encounter a shorter pendant. Finally, your local lobster fishermen will thank you for impinging to a lesser extent on the fishing grounds. Rather than rely on something written in the Hamilton Marine catalog, ask the local harbor master or lobstermen what they think. I'd bet they'd lean to shorter gear.
These are just casual ideas that can make life at sea a bit more civil.