Boating may be illegal in all of USA

Discussions about Cape Dory, Intrepid and Robinhood sailboats and how we use them. Got questions? Have answers? Provide them here.

Moderator: Jim Walsh

Post Reply
User avatar
Domenic
Posts: 95
Joined: Nov 1st, '05, 16:43
Location: Cape Dory 10 Hull 1278 & Moody 45ac Janique III Liberty Landing Marina. Jersey City.

Boating may be illegal in all of USA

Post by Domenic »

US Diatrict Court Judge near Louisiana ruled a few days ago that pleasure boating is illegal and trespassing on the Mississippi river. And perhapes the whole USA. Did any of you guys hear about it?
User avatar
Carter Brey
Posts: 709
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 12:02
Location: 1982 Sabre 28 Mk II #532 "Delphine"
City Island, New York
Contact:

Re: Boating may be illegal in all of USA

Post by Carter Brey »

Domenic wrote:US Diatrict Court Judge near Louisiana ruled a few days ago that pleasure boating is illegal and trespassing on the Mississippi river. And perhapes the whole USA. Did any of you guys hear about it?
I knew there had to be a reason it was so much fun!

Carter Brey
Sabre 28 Mk II #532 "Delphine"
City Island, NY
User avatar
Didereaux
Posts: 492
Joined: Feb 6th, '05, 11:29
Location: last owner of CD-25 #183 "Spring Gail"

okay here's a link...

Post by Didereaux »

http://www.mountainbuzz.com/viewtopic.php?t=11027

There are several references to this if you GOOGLE it.

Biting my tongue, pinching tender things etc I will keep from commenting further except to say...ain't no way this ruling will survive appeal. Although I side with Carter, keep it illegal it's more fun that way.

We truly live in the Chinese proverb about '...living in interesting times!'
Didereaux- San Leon, TX
last owner of CD-25 #183 "Spring Gail"
"I do not attempt to make leopards change their spots...after I have skinned them, they are free to grow 'em back or not, as they see fit!" Didereaux 2007
Neil Gordon
Posts: 4367
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 17:25
Location: s/v LIQUIDITY, CD28. We sail from Marina Bay on Boston Harbor. Try us on channel 9.
Contact:

Re: Boating may be illegal in all of USA

Post by Neil Gordon »

Domenic wrote:... pleasure boating is illegal ...
So if you sail with a frown on your face, you're imune from prosecution?
Fair winds, Neil

s/v LIQUIDITY
Cape Dory 28 #167
Boston, MA

CDSOA member #698
User avatar
Russell
Posts: 2473
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 11:14
Location: s/v Lady PaulineCape Dory 36 #117

Post by Russell »

For some reason this ruling is making the rounds on tons of cruising message boards always with a misleading title suggesting "boating" may be illegal. This is simply not true, the ruling a few weeks ago was not directed at boating, in fact it specificly cites the rights of a boater in navigable waters of the US. The ruling is only about FISHING on flooded property. There is a marine professional association who is pushing misinformation about the ruling in order to get support from all boaters, basicly a bunch of retailers are worried they may not sell as many fish hooks.
Russell
s/v (yet to be named) Tayana 42CC
s/v Lady Pauline Cape Dory 36 #117 (for sale)
John D.
Posts: 88
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 10:14
Location: "Lilypad"
CD27 #105
Annapolis, Maryland
Contact:

Post by John D. »

I just read the whole opinion, and it only applies to fishing and hunting on private property that is periodically flooded by the Mississippi River. Also, it only applies in the Western District of Louisiana. The one thing I found troubling is that it seems to give the landowner exclusive rights BELOW the mean high water mark. But the Mississippi is non-tidal at that point, so it might make sense in that context, as distinct from the tidal waters rule that the public has rights up to the mean high water mark.

In Maryland, with a very few minor exceptions, ALL submerged land under tidal waters is owned by the State, so we're all OK on the Chesapeake, at least as far as Virginia.
User avatar
Russell
Posts: 2473
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 11:14
Location: s/v Lady PaulineCape Dory 36 #117

Post by Russell »

Interesting note, since this showed up on a few message boards today, I went back to a site I had first seen the news story posted on. TradeOnlyToday.com their origonal story was this:

First Story

That day I sent them an email pointing to specific language in the court ruling and my displeasure with the irresonsible journalism they were practicing by just being spoon fed what some organization told them without checking the facts for themselves. They responded to my email asking if I wanted it included as a lettor to the editor, I said I didnt and that I just hoped they check the facts and report accurately about the story. Its not that I support the judges ruling making fishing or hunting not a right (I could care less) but it annoys me to no end misleading the public by suggesting all boating had been declared illegal. I notice now the day after that email exchange they posted a new story about the case:

Second Story

As you can see this one is much more clear on what the case is really about, and it is obvious that boating is still legal and even points out:
The judge says the land, because it is on the banks of the river, is subject to public use.

“Such public use, however, is limited to activities that are incidental to the navigable character of the Mississippi River and its enjoyment as an avenue of commerce. The court finds that fishing and hunting are not included in those rights,” James writes in his ruling.
Russell
s/v (yet to be named) Tayana 42CC
s/v Lady Pauline Cape Dory 36 #117 (for sale)
User avatar
Sea Hunt
Posts: 1310
Joined: Jan 29th, '06, 23:14
Location: Former caretaker of 1977 Cape Dory Typhoon Weekender (Hull #1400) "S/V Tadpole"

Post by Sea Hunt »

Interesting discussion. I must admit when I first heard of this story yesterday, I was surprised because those circulating it ("talking heads" on local radios programs) said things like “all boating in US declared illegal”; “boating and sailing banned on US waters”, etc. After a 30 year career as an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Retired), I was even more surprised when they said it was a United States district court judge who issued the “ban”. Federal judges are very, very cautious about making broad rulings.

So, I actually went and got a copy of the opinion. It is reported as:

NORMAL PARM, JR., ET AL VERSUS MARK W. SHUMATE

CIVIL ACTION NO. 01-2624

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MONROE DIVISION

As has been stated in earlier postings, this case does NOT ban boating or sailing on navigable waters, etc. The court’s ruling pertains only to hunting and fishing. Apparently, in a certain area of Louisiana, the Mississippi River floods certain privately owned lands at certain times of the year. When this happens fishermen (and apparently hunters) have access by water to what is otherwise private land. The land owners were upset about fishermen and hunters trespassing on their private land when the Mississippi River periodically flooded their land, so they got the local Sheriff to arrest the fishermen and hunters, who then promptly filed a lawsuit against the Sheriff for damages claiming they were wrongly arrested.

The US district court judge simply found that the fishermen and hunters do not have “a federal common law right to fish and hunt on the Mississippi River, up to the high water mark, when it floods privately owned land.” The important words here are “fish and hunt”. That is all that is prohibited and only so on privately owned lands which are occasionally flooded by the Mississippi River. The judge found that because the privately owned land is a “bank of the Mississippi River” and therefore subject to “public use . . . incidental to the navigable character of the Mississippi River”, hunting and fishing are prohibited because these activities are not incidental to the navigable character of the river.

Sailors and pleasure boaters are safe. Neil, you do not have to wear a frown when sailing. :D

If anyone has any trouble sleeping, you can read the entire opinion at:

http://www.americanwhitewater.org/conte ... play/full/
Last edited by Sea Hunt on Sep 20th, '06, 20:25, edited 1 time in total.
Fair winds,

Robert

Sea Hunt a/k/a "The Tadpole Sailor"
CDSOA #1097
User avatar
Domenic
Posts: 95
Joined: Nov 1st, '05, 16:43
Location: Cape Dory 10 Hull 1278 & Moody 45ac Janique III Liberty Landing Marina. Jersey City.

Post by Domenic »

Thanks Robert, Domenic
User avatar
Warren Kaplan
Posts: 1147
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 11:44
Location: Former owner of Sine Qua Non CD27 #166 1980 Oyster Bay Harbor, NY Member # 317

Post by Warren Kaplan »

Carter,

Certainly you are aware anything that is fun or pleasurable is either illegal, immoral or it makes you fat! :wink:
"I desire no more delight, than to be under sail and gone tonight."
(W. Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice)
Post Reply