CD Typhoon cockpit drains & all the rest

Discussions about Cape Dory, Intrepid and Robinhood sailboats and how we use them. Got questions? Have answers? Provide them here.

Moderator: bobdugan

Post Reply
spoefish
Posts: 3
Joined: May 29th, '06, 18:51
Location: Typhoon #1635 (1979) "Nymph", currently moored on a trailer in my back yard getting some m

CD Typhoon cockpit drains & all the rest

Post by spoefish »

I have a 1979 Typhoon DS that is out of the water for some serious cleaning and long-overdue maintenance this summer. Looking to being back in the water by Labor Day for a nice fall on the Chesapeake. I have what I guess is a typical problem with the inadequate gate valves that CD used on these boats. For a couple of years I have been thinking it was time to get this fixed, and last week at a local marine supply that was going out of business I picked up the upgrade hardware (1” bronze through hull fitting, 1” Apollo Flanged bronze seacocks, barbed fitting that goes on top of the seacock) for a little less than the 3/4” hardware that would be normal replacements would have cost me. But I still am not sure of which direction to go. If it helps, I sail on the Chesapeake, and the boat is usually in the water from April until November, spending the winter on a trailer in my yard. The options seem to range from (simple to complex):

1. Take out the whole current system, and replace with 3/4” barbed bronze through hull fittings. No valves or seacocks, just hose with double clamps from cockpit drains to the through hulls.

2. Put 3/4” seacocks on the existing through hull fittings – maybe pull out the TH fittings and rebed them if necessary. This would just be an upgrade of the current gate valves to real seacocks.

3. Or take advantage of the great new hardware I have and ream out the holes to fit my new 1” thru hull fittings and use the 1” Seacocks. I would need to adapt the cockpit drains to the larger hardware – not too difficult. This would drain a little faster, but then on the other hand I have never really had much of a problem except when junk got caught in the gate valves and I had to plunge it out.

I have read a lot of the old postings, and still wonder if I really need the ability to shut things off – in 15 years with this boat I have never had a problem with hoses. This leaves me a little inclined to go with option 1, and make someone a great deal on a pair of new 1” seacocks and hardware. Whatever I do, I think the gate valves are actually worse than nothing so they will have to go.

Thanks in advance for any suggestions or opinions.

Stephen
"Ability to play the banjo soon places one in a social position to pick and
choose from scores of social invitations. Everywhere, the banjoist is
assured of a hearty welcome."

An excerpt from THE BANJO, a 1927 pamphlet published by Gibson, Inc.
Carl Thunberg
Posts: 1284
Joined: Nov 21st, '05, 08:20
Location: CD28 Cruiser "Loon" Poorhouse Cove, ME

Since no one else has responded . . .

Post by Carl Thunberg »

Stephen,

I was assuming one of our more seasoned veterans would respond. Replacing the seacocks really is not a difficult job, and you do need to think about re-sale value. An educated buyer would have the boat surveyed and would use the lack of valves as leverage in lowering your asking price. Also, I have no idea what the implications of removing the valves would have on your insurance. I could see and insurance company denying coverage if standard equipment was removed.

Also, without a valve, there would be no way to replace a hose with the boat in the water. Just because a hose hasn't split in the 15 years you've owned the boat doesn't mean it never will. It just seems wrong to remove the seacocks. Just my $0.02.

Carl
CDSOA Commodore - Member No. 725

"The more I expand the island of my knowledge, the more I expand the shoreline of my wonder"
Sir Isaac Newton
User avatar
rtbates
Posts: 1149
Joined: Aug 18th, '05, 14:09
Location: 1984 25D #161

#3

Post by rtbates »

I MUST respond with a resounding NO to #1. You really must have a way to shut off any and all thru hulls.

I'd bite the bullet and go with #3.

Best wishes
Randy 25D Seraph #161
Serge Zimberoff
Posts: 57
Joined: Oct 27th, '05, 14:08
Location: Typhoon #1700 (1980)
"Cloning Around"
Lake Sonoma, CA

Typhoon cockpit drains

Post by Serge Zimberoff »

Just to add to the confusion I'll vote for #2. Whereas upsizing etc could be a good idea, because of the limited space I would be reluctant to do anything to shorten the distance between the seacock and the fitting on the cockpit sole. That short hose is hard enough to install as it is and be happy it is as straight as possible and the 1" fittings will reduce this already tight fit by at least 2".
Serge
User avatar
Al Levesque
Posts: 295
Joined: Feb 6th, '05, 09:00
Location: Athena CD33 #94 Salem MA

Vote for 1

Post by Al Levesque »

There is too little space to have good drainage through a valve. I have seen older Tys and other boats with the simple hose double clamped on both ends. If you feel proficient with glass work, consider moving the through-hull forward where there is more space. That would improve your options.
User avatar
Al Levesque
Posts: 295
Joined: Feb 6th, '05, 09:00
Location: Athena CD33 #94 Salem MA

Oops?

Post by Al Levesque »

As I reread your post, I noticed the DS. That may modify my comment about getting more space by moving the thru-hulls. I don't know what the arrangement is for the daysailer.
spoefish
Posts: 3
Joined: May 29th, '06, 18:51
Location: Typhoon #1635 (1979) "Nymph", currently moored on a trailer in my back yard getting some m

Post by spoefish »

I think my brain must have been waterlogged - my boat is a weekender and has been for the last 15 years. The DS must have come from the Day Sailer that I just bought. Much as I love the Typhoon, I often miss taking my DS along on trips - towing and launching the Typhoon is just a little too much for me. So now I have both. And I guess I will eliminate Door No. 3, so if anyone is interested in a new pair of Apollo 1" traingle flange seacocks with thru hulls and barbs let me know - I don't think they need to go in the box of stuff I save for when I get a bigger boart - that seems less likely all the time. And thanks for the input.

Stephen
"Ability to play the banjo soon places one in a social position to pick and
choose from scores of social invitations. Everywhere, the banjoist is
assured of a hearty welcome."

An excerpt from THE BANJO, a 1927 pamphlet published by Gibson, Inc.
User avatar
RIKanaka
Posts: 288
Joined: Jun 8th, '05, 10:22
Location: 1988 CD26 #73 "Moku Ahi" (Fireboat), Dutch Harbor, RI

Agree with Serge, go with #2

Post by RIKanaka »

I tried to do #2 (stop snickering!) but ended up having the cut the through-hulls off because the gate valves were frozen onto them. If you can get seacocks that already have a hose fitting instead of having to add a separate piece you will have less of a problem with the hose kinking between the drain and the seacock. Or get the lowest profile seacock you can find that requires a separate hose fitting.
Aloha,

Bob Chinn
MBolton
Posts: 9
Joined: Feb 7th, '05, 21:43
Location: Cape Dory Typhoon Weekender

Tempted to choose Option 1 (No seacocks)

Post by MBolton »

While I know this goes against all nautical wisdom -- I too am tempted to replace the frozen corroded gate valves on my Typhoon with high quality straight-thru hoses and premium double clamps. Yes, no sea cocks, ball valves or gate valves at all.

My reason -- can anyone give me any instance when a seacocks on a Typhoon (kept in the water all the time) would ever be closed?

The boat is floating unattended at the dock 99.99 percent of the time so on my boat the seacocks are open to drain rain water. The only time I would ever be able to avail myself of the safety of a sea cock would be if I happened to be sailing when a hose failure occurred. Then I would grab a tapered plug or something and pinch off the hose.

I've owned larger boats with way too many holes in the bottom (engine, head, sink etc.) and ALWAYS maintained those seacocks meticulously and made sure they were closed. But even on my 27 footer, the cockpit drain seacocks always had to remain open.

All comments and verbal flaming welcome and appreciated!

J. Mark Bolton
Cape Dory Typhoon
Ossabaw Sound (Near Savannah) Georgia.
User avatar
bottomscraper
Posts: 1400
Joined: Feb 5th, '05, 11:08
Location: Previous Owner of CD36 Mahalo #163 1990
Contact:

Option 1 - Why NOT

Post by bottomscraper »

If you aren't on the boat and hose breaks you lost the boat. If you are on the boat and a hose breaks you might end up going down with the boat! I also suspect that the most likely cause for a hose to break is some human action.
Rich Abato
Nordic Tug 34 Tanuki

Previous Owner Of CD36 Mahalo #163

Southern Maine
http://www.sailmahalo.com
Dick Villamil
Posts: 456
Joined: Feb 6th, '05, 16:42
Location: CD Typhoon, Victoria, Essex Jct. VT

cockpit drains

Post by Dick Villamil »

I replaced my old frozen and plugged gate valves on my '76 Ty. Since I sail in fresh water I used gate valves. However I strongly recommend using standard seacocks or bronze ball valves for salt water. There have been a few postings a year or so ago on this very topic with some great advice. Do #2 even though the 3/4" elbow is a bit of a bend it saves space and works if you keep her clear. I wouldn't recommend closing them when not on the boat because a good strong rainstorm or three may flood the cockpit. It is just a safety factor in case the worst case happens. Be sure to exercise the valves on a regular basis and keep them lubricated so they don't sieze.
Post Reply