CNG is tougher to compress into liquid state than propane, so there are very few sources for the gas in the US. This is kind of odd as you state, since propane takes 2x the refining to get the finished product, compared to CNG. CNG is essentially methane gas, with a tincture of propane, and other fractions of the distilled oil product added in.
One fairly major difference is that the BTU content of Propane is 2500, while CNG is only 1000. That means that it will take 2x more CNG to do the same job as Propane. However, it burns cleaner, is lighter than air, and *should* be far cheaper than propane, since there is less work involved in producing it.
Cheers,
Larry DeMers
s/v DeLaMer
CD30 on Lake Superior (well ok, 50 feet away from the lake, on the hard now)
Troy Scott wrote:Of course the real "safe and easy" stove fuel is CNG. Many years ago, when it was introduced to the boating public, it was widely understood to be safer than propane because if it does happen to leak, the vapors drift up and safely away rather than becoming a bomb in the bilge. It was popular and common at one time, but it's no longer readily available. I have no idea what politics or other shenanigans led to the demise of CNG in the market, but the lack of ready availability (compared to less safe propane) is just dumb.
My CD36 came into my life with an old CNG stove. I have learned that I can drive to a certain place in Alabama and get my tanks refilled. This is one of those "word of mouth" connections that I lucked into because of a CDSOA connection. This compared to propane, which though less safe, is on practically every street corner. Go figure.